O
Frederick
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Discussion of Proposed Data Center Moratorium

Frederick

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (8)Opposed (8)

At a glance

Public comments
16
Last 30 days
16

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 8, 2026.

Public comments (16)

SupportiveKathy KinseyOct 8, 2026

Speaking for Mobilize Frederick, expressed strong support for the data center moratorium, suggesting a three-year duration rather than two and adding safeguards for emergency responders and cooling systems.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:03:09 →
OpposedJoe WhitebreadOct 8, 2026

Representing Trammell Crow Company, argued that a moratorium is unnecessary because the existing zoning text amendment process already allows ample time for public feedback and expert consultation.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:06:35 →
OpposedBruce DeanOct 8, 2026

An attorney and city resident representing Trammell Crow noted that not all residents oppose data centers and pointed out that proposed setbacks would keep facilities away from residences.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:09:25 →
SupportiveRichard WagenruderOct 8, 2026

Expressed concern about data center impacts, urging the council to take its time, spend money on expert studies, and avoid turning Frederick into another Loudoun County.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:12:50 →
SupportiveBetty LawOct 8, 2026

An electric power engineer supported the moratorium, emphasizing the need to study power and water demands and incorporate subject-matter experts into a citizen committee.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:16:16 →
SupportiveSteve JacobsonOct 8, 2026

Stated that a two-year timeframe is reasonable compared to past city initiatives and praised the use of citizen-based committees.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:19:29 →
SupportiveKevin ZellnerOct 8, 2026

Supported the moratorium to allow state studies to conclude and new low-impact technologies to develop before rushing into land use changes.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:25:04 →
OpposedRico AlbacarisOct 8, 2026

Representing IBW Local 24, suggested that a two-year moratorium is excessive and that reasonable environmental and safety regulations can be established more quickly.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:26:24 →
OpposedChris AndersonOct 8, 2026

Representing plumbers and steamfitters, asked the council to consider a shorter one-year moratorium with an early out clause to balance protections with career opportunities.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:28:45 →
SupportiveSteven DucettOct 8, 2026

Urged the council to reject developer-drafted amendments and enact a two-year moratorium to protect residents from high-impact infrastructure.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:31:33 →
OpposedTony CrusadeOct 8, 2026

Questioned the two-year moratorium, suggesting the city should instead establish clear measurable standards and focus on expanding commercial tax bases.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:35:05 →
OpposedAndrew ZirkelOct 8, 2026

Representing the Maryland Tech Council, opposed the two-year moratorium and suggested leveraging state task force assistance rather than freezing the review process.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:38:51 →
OpposedRobert SharpOct 8, 2026

Expressed opposition to data centers entirely, arguing they pose health and safety risks and do not belong in populated areas.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:42:13 →
SupportiveFreddie VenturaOct 8, 2026

Supported the moratorium, urging the council to be cautious and protect residents rather than corporate interests.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:45:14 →
OpposedDanielle AdamsOct 8, 2026

Representing the Frederick County Building Industry Association, commented on the economic optics of moratoriums and the importance of balanced economic development.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:46:43 →
SupportiveDave SchmidtOct 8, 2026

Suggested that any moratorium period be used to evaluate how the city interacts with all large incoming businesses and engages the community early.

City Council Work Session - Oct 8, 2026 · 1:50:19 →