O
Frederick
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Husky Park Road Extension and Parkland Preservation

Frederick

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (1)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 27, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedKevin HalukAug 27, 2026

Expressed deep concern over the proposed road through Husky Park, citing a lack of traffic need, missing legal and environmental foundations, and no prior public hearings on the road project.

City Council Work Session - Aug 27, 2026 · 6:01 →
SupportiveJenny JenkinsAug 27, 2026

Supported neighbors in questioning plans to put a road through parkland, drawing a comparison to protecting Central Park in New York.

City Council Work Session - Aug 27, 2026 · 1:20:52 →
SupportiveJames MaryAug 27, 2026

Shared safety concerns cycling along Church Street and expressed strong support for building a shared-use path to improve bicycle safety and connectivity.

City Council Work Session - Aug 27, 2026 · 1:21:49 →
SupportiveRob ThompsonAug 27, 2026

Representing Ren Quarter developers, expressed support for the walking and biking path connection while hoping to preserve green space where possible.

City Council Work Session - Aug 27, 2026 · 1:23:01 →
MixedMark BurroughsAug 27, 2026

Noted that he backs up to Husky Park and emphasized that connectivity through a path is the key priority, regardless of whether a road is built.

City Council Work Session - Aug 27, 2026 · 1:24:48 →
SupportiveHeather GoddardAug 27, 2026

Speaking for East Frederick Rising, praised the collaborative work session and expressed support for both the shared-use path and the road extension to improve traffic circulation in East Frederick.

City Council Work Session - Aug 27, 2026 · 1:25:59 →
ConcernedTroy MooreAug 27, 2026

Raised safety and risk considerations for children riding bikes along the proposed path.

City Council Work Session - Aug 27, 2026 · 1:29:43 →