O
Frederick
← Community
HousingCommunity discussion

Section 802 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

Frederick

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (2)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 9, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedMeta NashMar 9, 2026

Expressed concern that eliminating owner-occupancy requirements for ADUs would invite corporate and private speculators to monetize older neighborhoods, undermining affordability.

Planning Commission - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:43:08 →
OpposedLinda DoveMar 9, 2026

Calculated that high construction costs for ADUs make them financially unviable as affordable housing, arguing they mainly benefit investors seeking to subdivide properties.

Planning Commission - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:47:28 →
ConcernedSteve JakubczekMar 9, 2026

Stated that outrageous construction expenses and lack of owner-occupancy rules will not create affordable housing, risking the deterioration of neighborhood character.

Planning Commission - Mar 9, 2026 · 4:43:52 →
MixedAnn RyanMar 9, 2026

Representing the Frederick Housing Solutions Task Force, noted that housing options need to be expanded but policymakers must figure out how to incentivize true affordability.

Planning Commission - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:52:58 →
ConcernedKate McDermottMar 9, 2026

Expressed worry over ADUs in 1950s ranch neighborhoods like Westbrook, arguing that fee-in-lieu policies for MPDUs are the real obstacle to affordable housing.

Planning Commission - Mar 9, 2026 · 2:54:50 →